본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Identifying Post-Surgical Recurrence Subtype of T1-Stage Colorectal Cancer by Machine Learning.

Digestion 2026 p. 1-13

Zhou X, Togashi K, Zhu X, Zhang T, Kajiwara Y, Oka S, Tanaka S, Nakamura T, Takamatsu M, Hotta K, Yamada M, Ikematsu H, Nagata S, Yamada K, Konishi J, Ishihara S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda K, Komori K, Ishiguro M, Tamaru Y, Okuyama T, Ohuchi A, Ohnuma S, Sakamoto K, Sugai T, Ajioka Y, Sugihara K, Ueno H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Traditional risk stratification heavily relies on expert judgment and manually established thresholds.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Zhou X, Togashi K, et al. (2026). Identifying Post-Surgical Recurrence Subtype of T1-Stage Colorectal Cancer by Machine Learning.. Digestion, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000550959
MLA Zhou X, et al.. "Identifying Post-Surgical Recurrence Subtype of T1-Stage Colorectal Cancer by Machine Learning.." Digestion, 2026, pp. 1-13.
PMID 41666137
DOI 10.1159/000550959

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Traditional risk stratification heavily relies on expert judgment and manually established thresholds. This study aims to automatically identify subtypes in the patients of T1-stage colorectal cancer with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence risk profiles, using machine learning.

[METHODS] We analyzed data from 3,367 patients (mean follow-up, 1,281 days) with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2009 and 2016 across 27 high-volume core Japanese institutions. Patients were split into derivation and test datasets (4:1 ratio). Hierarchical clustering was employed to identify recurrence subtypes in the derivation dataset. Machine learning classifiers were developed and validated on the test dataset. Co-occurrence and Bayesian network analyses aided interpretation.

[RESULTS] Three distinct subtypes were identified: two high-risk (subtypes 1 and 2) and one low-risk (subtype 3). Subtype 1 was predominantly associated with polypoid morphology (94.8%), whereas subtype 2 was characterized by flat morphology (89.4%). Subtype 2 showed a relatively consistent presence across most factors, with comparable levels of lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and tumor budding. Subtype 3 shared similarities with subtype 1 in polypoid morphology (76.5%) but differed in other factors. These findings showed similar trend on the test dataset. Subtype-specific risk factors included lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastasis in both high-risk subtypes, while rectal location was unique to subtype 1 and polypoid morphology and large size were specific to subtype 2.

[CONCLUSION] This machine learning approach identified three distinct recurrence subtypes of T1 colorectal cancer, each with unique characteristics and risk profiles, indicating the potential value of subtype-specific clinical strategies.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)