본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A decade later: Geographic access to plastic surgery in the U.S. using the 2022 Area Health Resource File.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2026 Vol.113() p. 721-723 🌐 cited 2 Diversity and Career in Medicine
OpenAlex 토픽 · Diversity and Career in Medicine Global Health Workforce Issues Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Jones NE, Dagi AF, Bogue JT

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 미국 내 성형외과 서비스 접근성의 지리적 불균형, 특히 농촌 및 소외 지역에서의 문제를 해결하기 위해 2012년부터 2022년까지 10년간 성형외과 전문의의 지리적 분포 변화를 추적하고 평가하는 것이 본 연구의 핵심 목표이다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Nadeem E Jones, Alexander F. Dagi, Jarrod T. Bogue (2026). A decade later: Geographic access to plastic surgery in the U.S. using the 2022 Area Health Resource File.. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 113, 721-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.040
MLA Nadeem E Jones, et al.. "A decade later: Geographic access to plastic surgery in the U.S. using the 2022 Area Health Resource File.." Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, vol. 113, 2026, pp. 721-723.
PMID 41372045

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Access to plastic surgery services remains unevenly distributed across the United States, particularly in rural and underserved areas. This study provides a 10-year update on the geographic distribution of plastic surgeons using 2022 data from the Area Health Resources File.

[METHODS] Plastic surgeon density was calculated for 942 Health Service Areas (HSAs) and stratified by demographic and healthcare infrastructure characteristics. Longitudinal changes in access from 2012 to 2022 were assessed. Practice type (office-based vs. hospital-employed) was also analyzed.

[RESULTS] In 2022, 49.9% of HSAs had no plastic surgeons, leaving 25.9 million Americans without local access. National plastic surgeon density declined from 2.42 to 2.14 per 100,000 population over the decade. Forty-one HSAs lost access to plastic surgeons, while 34 gained access. Regions that lost access had lower income, greater rurality, older populations, and fewer physicians per capita. Practice types were similarly distributed across HSAs regardless of plastic surgeon density in 2022.

[CONCLUSION] Geographic disparities in access to plastic surgery persist, with nearly half of U.S. regions lacking local providers. These disparities are shaped more by regional sociodemographic and infrastructure factors than by practice type. Policy interventions, training reforms, and rural workforce incentives are needed to address these inequities.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
약물 HSAs → Health Service Areas scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; United States; Health Services Accessibility; Surgery, Plastic; Healthcare Disparities; Medically Underserved Area