Vertical Sculpted Pillar Reduction Mammaplasty in 317 Patients: Technique, Complications, and BREAST-Q Outcomes.
APA
Derby BM, Grotting JC, Redden DT (2016). Vertical Sculpted Pillar Reduction Mammaplasty in 317 Patients: Technique, Complications, and BREAST-Q Outcomes.. Aesthetic surgery journal, 36(4), 417-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv217
MLA
Derby BM, et al.. "Vertical Sculpted Pillar Reduction Mammaplasty in 317 Patients: Technique, Complications, and BREAST-Q Outcomes.." Aesthetic surgery journal, vol. 36, no. 4, 2016, pp. 417-30.
PMID
26906351
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The senior author (JCG) has described the vertical sculpted pillar breast reduction.
[OBJECTIVES] This manuscript aimed to compare this technique's safety profile to other established techniques via complication rate reporting. Few studies have utilized the BREAST-Q for long-term outcomes reporting in bilateral reduction mammaplasty patients. BREAST-Q outcome comparisons, between cosmetic and insurance-based breast reduction cohorts, have not been previously reported.
[METHODS] A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty using the vertical sculpted pillar technique. The BREAST-Q postoperative reduction mammaplasty module was administered. Complication rates and outcomes data were compared among patient cohorts distinguished by pedicle, scar pattern, and payor population. Statistically significant differences were set at P < .05.
[RESULTS] Compared to the superior pedicle, use of the superomedial pedicle statistically increased rates of postoperative fat necrosis in this series. Complication rates did not differ among scar patterns, but use of a J, L-shaped, or short-T scar decreased the need for secondary/revisional surgery. Cosmetic and insurance-based outcomes did not differ in any domain of the postoperative reduction mammaplasty BREAST-Q module.
[CONCLUSIONS] Complications data for the vertical sculpted pillar reduction mammaplasty were comparable to published results for other techniques. Complication rates are unaffected by scar pattern. Superomedial pedicle selection and larger insurance-based reductions may predispose to statistically significant increases in fat necrosis compared to use of the superior pedicle. Payor source neither affects the majority of complication rates, nor BREAST-Q satisfaction and quality of life domains. This information can be used to improve management of expectations during the preoperative consultation process.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 4 Therapeutic.
[OBJECTIVES] This manuscript aimed to compare this technique's safety profile to other established techniques via complication rate reporting. Few studies have utilized the BREAST-Q for long-term outcomes reporting in bilateral reduction mammaplasty patients. BREAST-Q outcome comparisons, between cosmetic and insurance-based breast reduction cohorts, have not been previously reported.
[METHODS] A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty using the vertical sculpted pillar technique. The BREAST-Q postoperative reduction mammaplasty module was administered. Complication rates and outcomes data were compared among patient cohorts distinguished by pedicle, scar pattern, and payor population. Statistically significant differences were set at P < .05.
[RESULTS] Compared to the superior pedicle, use of the superomedial pedicle statistically increased rates of postoperative fat necrosis in this series. Complication rates did not differ among scar patterns, but use of a J, L-shaped, or short-T scar decreased the need for secondary/revisional surgery. Cosmetic and insurance-based outcomes did not differ in any domain of the postoperative reduction mammaplasty BREAST-Q module.
[CONCLUSIONS] Complications data for the vertical sculpted pillar reduction mammaplasty were comparable to published results for other techniques. Complication rates are unaffected by scar pattern. Superomedial pedicle selection and larger insurance-based reductions may predispose to statistically significant increases in fat necrosis compared to use of the superior pedicle. Payor source neither affects the majority of complication rates, nor BREAST-Q satisfaction and quality of life domains. This information can be used to improve management of expectations during the preoperative consultation process.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 4 Therapeutic.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 8 | |
| 시술 | mammaplasty
|
유방성형술 | dict | 6 | |
| 시술 | breast reduction
|
유방성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 합병증 | necrosis
|
괴사 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | payor
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | fat
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | pillar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | pillar breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | scar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | Sculpted
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Complications
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | postoperative reduction
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | scar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | pillar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | superomedial pedicle
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Postoperative Complications; Process Assessment, Health Care; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.