본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 2003 Vol.50(11) p. 1233-42

Palmer GM, Zhu C, Breslin TM, Xu F, Gilchrist KW, Ramanujam N

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 20) tissue samples were obtained from breast cancer and breast reduction surgeries.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 36
  • Sensitivity 30%
  • Specificity 70%

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Palmer GM, Zhu C, et al. (2003). Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 50(11), 1233-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2003.818488
MLA Palmer GM, et al.. "Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).." IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, vol. 50, no. 11, 2003, pp. 1233-42.
PMID 14619993

Abstract

Nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 20) tissue samples were obtained from breast cancer and breast reduction surgeries. These tissues were characterized using multiple excitation wavelength fluorescence spectroscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible wavelength range, immediately after excision. Spectra were then analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) as a data reduction technique. PCA was performed on each fluorescence spectrum, as well as on the diffuse reflectance spectrum individually, to establish a set of principal components for each spectrum. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine which principal components show statistically significant differences between malignant and nonmalignant tissues. Finally, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was utilized to classify the samples based on the diagnostically useful principal components. Cross-validation of this nonparametric algorithm was carried out to determine its classification accuracy in an unbiased manner. Multiexcitation fluorescence spectroscopy was successful in discriminating malignant and nonmalignant tissues, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 92%, respectively. The sensitivity (30%) and specificity (78%) of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy alone was significantly lower. Combining fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra did not improve the classification accuracy of an algorithm based on fluorescence spectra alone. The fluorescence excitation-emission wavelengths identified as being diagnostic from the PCA-SVM algorithm suggest that the important fluorophores for breast cancer diagnosis are most likely tryptophan, NAD(P)H and flavoproteins.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 4
시술 breast reduction 유방성형술 dict 1
해부 tissues scispacy 1
해부 nonmalignant tissues scispacy 1
약물 tryptophan C0041249
tryptophan
scispacy 1
약물 fluorophores scispacy 1
약물 NAD(P)H scispacy 1
질환 breast cancer C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
scispacy 1
질환 malignant and nonmalignant tissues scispacy 1
기타 flavoproteins scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Algorithms; Breast Neoplasms; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Humans; Pattern Recognition, Automated; Predictive Value of Tests; Principal Component Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문