본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Trends in medical malpractice claims in patients with cleft or craniofacial abnormalities in the United States.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2016 Vol.90() p. 214-219 피인용 1회

Rawal RB, Kilpatrick LA, Wood JS, Drake AF

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 미국에서 구순구개열 및 두개안면 기형(craniofacial abnormalities)을 가진 환자들을 대상으로 한 의료 과실 소송(medical malpractice claims)의 경향성을 규명하고, 관련 소송의 특징과 배상금 규모를 분석하여 임상적 위험 요인을 파악하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.058

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Rawal RB, Kilpatrick LA, et al. (2016). Trends in medical malpractice claims in patients with cleft or craniofacial abnormalities in the United States.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 90, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.030
MLA Rawal RB, et al.. "Trends in medical malpractice claims in patients with cleft or craniofacial abnormalities in the United States.." International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, vol. 90, 2016, pp. 214-219.
PMID 27729136

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To describe medical malpractice trends in patients with cleft and/or craniofacial abnormalities.

[METHODS AND MATERIALS] A modified Delphi approach was used to gather search terms. Search settings included "all jury verdicts and settlements", with jurisdiction of "all states" and "all federal courts" (by court and circuit). A retrospective review of WestLawNext legal database was conducted. Cases were excluded if they did not have a direct association from the patient's craniofacial anomaly or if they were not related to malpractice.

[RESULTS] Forty-two cases met inclusion criteria. Cases closed between 1981 and 2014 were included. The mean payment among claims with an indemnity payment was $3.9 million. Of cases brought to trial, 62% were in favor of the plaintiff. Amongst physicians named as co-defendants, pediatricians were most commonly named (24%), followed by plastic surgeons (16%), obstetricians (7.8%), and radiologists (7.8%). "Missed diagnosis" was the most common type of negligent claim (45%), followed by "surgical error" (21%), and "medication error" (17%). "Anoxic brain injury" resulted in the highest median indemnity payment for complication of patient management ($3.5 million), followed by "wrongful birth" ($1.03 million), and "minor physical injury" ($520,000). No specific type of negligent claim (p = 0.764) nor complication of patient management (p = 0.61) was associated with a greater indemnity payment. Mean indemnity payment was $920,000 prior to 2001 and $4.4 million after 2001 (p = 0.058).

[CONCLUSIONS] Mean indemnity payments were fourteen-fold greater in patients as compared to those in the overall population ($3.9 million versus $274,887) and seven-fold greater than those in the average pediatric population ($3.9 million versus $520,923). All healthcare providers should be aware of the associated medical malpractice claims that may be incurred when treating patients at risk for these conditions.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 brain scispacy 1
질환 cleft or craniofacial abnormalities C0376634
Craniofacial Abnormalities
scispacy 1
질환 cleft and/or craniofacial abnormalities scispacy 1
질환 craniofacial anomaly C0376634
Craniofacial Abnormalities
scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Craniofacial Abnormalities; Databases, Factual; Diagnostic Errors; Disease Management; Female; Health Personnel; Humans; Infant; Liability, Legal; Male; Malpractice; Medical Errors; Obstetrics; Pediatricians; Pediatrics; Physicians; Radiologists; Retrospective Studies; Surgery, Plastic; United States; Wrongful Life

📑 인용 관계