Immunogenicity of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Different Clinical and Cosmetic Treatment, a Literature Review.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Botulinum toxin type A is widely utilized for both therapeutic and aesthetic purposes, yet concerns regarding its immunogenicity have raised issues related to treatment failure and adverse reactions.
[OBJECTIVE] This review aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of commercially available botulinum toxin type A products across various clinical indications and identify the risk factors associated with antibody formation.
[METHODS] A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to find studies that investigated the immunogenicity of botulinum toxin type A in patients treated for different conditions. The studies were classified based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's evidence hierarchy.
[RESULTS] The overall incidence of neutralizing antibody formation with botulinum toxin type A treatment is relatively low. However, it varies depending on the indication and is influenced by factors such as the frequency of injections and the cumulative dose. The total cumulative dose and the number of treatment cycles are critical factors in determining the risk of developing antibodies against botulinum toxin type A.
[CONCLUSION] This literature review highlights that the immunogenicity of botulinum toxin type A products differs across indications, with repeated injections posing a significant risk for the formation of neutralizing antibodies. The findings underscore the need for further research to better understand antibody formation mechanisms and to develop strategies that minimize their impact on treatment efficacy.
[OBJECTIVE] This review aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of commercially available botulinum toxin type A products across various clinical indications and identify the risk factors associated with antibody formation.
[METHODS] A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to find studies that investigated the immunogenicity of botulinum toxin type A in patients treated for different conditions. The studies were classified based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's evidence hierarchy.
[RESULTS] The overall incidence of neutralizing antibody formation with botulinum toxin type A treatment is relatively low. However, it varies depending on the indication and is influenced by factors such as the frequency of injections and the cumulative dose. The total cumulative dose and the number of treatment cycles are critical factors in determining the risk of developing antibodies against botulinum toxin type A.
[CONCLUSION] This literature review highlights that the immunogenicity of botulinum toxin type A products differs across indications, with repeated injections posing a significant risk for the formation of neutralizing antibodies. The findings underscore the need for further research to better understand antibody formation mechanisms and to develop strategies that minimize their impact on treatment efficacy.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | botulinum toxin
|
보툴리눔독소 주사 | dict | 7 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Botulinum toxin type A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSION]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | failure and adverse reactions
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | botulinum toxin type
|
C0006050
botulinum toxin type A
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | Botulinum Toxin Type A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Adverse neurological events following botulinum toxin type A: A case series of post-injection seizures and paralysis.
- Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A.
- Current Perspectives on Pectoralis Minor Syndrome: A Narrative Review.