Efficacy and safety of neuronox for lateral canthal lines: a phase I/III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Neuronox has not yet been investigated for its efficacy and safety in the treatment of lateral canthal lines (LCL).
[METHODS] This study was a randomized, double-blind, active drug controlled, multicenter, 16 week, Phase I/III study designed to determine the non-inferiority of Neuronox compared to onabotulinumtoxin A (ONA) in the treatment of moderate to severe LCL. Thirty subjects in Phase I and 220 subjects in Phase III were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single treatment (24 U) of either Neuronox or ONA. The primary endpoint of the Phase III study was the responder rate according to the proportion of subjects achieving Grade 0 (none) or 1 (mild) from 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) in LCL severity at maximum smile as assessed by the investigators at Week 4. Additional efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints (adverse events) were also evaluated.
[RESULTS] The primary endpoint was achieved as the proportion of responders was 83% for both Neuronox and ONA, thus, supporting the non-inferiority of Neuronox compare to ONA. The two groups also showed no statistical differences in safety analyses.
[CONCLUSION] Treatment of moderate to severe LCL with Neuronox was effective and well-tolerated.
[METHODS] This study was a randomized, double-blind, active drug controlled, multicenter, 16 week, Phase I/III study designed to determine the non-inferiority of Neuronox compared to onabotulinumtoxin A (ONA) in the treatment of moderate to severe LCL. Thirty subjects in Phase I and 220 subjects in Phase III were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single treatment (24 U) of either Neuronox or ONA. The primary endpoint of the Phase III study was the responder rate according to the proportion of subjects achieving Grade 0 (none) or 1 (mild) from 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) in LCL severity at maximum smile as assessed by the investigators at Week 4. Additional efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints (adverse events) were also evaluated.
[RESULTS] The primary endpoint was achieved as the proportion of responders was 83% for both Neuronox and ONA, thus, supporting the non-inferiority of Neuronox compare to ONA. The two groups also showed no statistical differences in safety analyses.
[CONCLUSION] Treatment of moderate to severe LCL with Neuronox was effective and well-tolerated.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | onabotulinumtoxin
|
보툴리눔독소 주사 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Skin Aging; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Adverse neurological events following botulinum toxin type A: A case series of post-injection seizures and paralysis.
- Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A.
- Current Perspectives on Pectoralis Minor Syndrome: A Narrative Review.