Validation of a Midfacial Scale and Its Use in a Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study of CPM-HA-V.

[BACKGROUND] Age-related loss of midfacial contour is frequently corrected using dermal fillers. A validated photonumeric scale is beneficial when evaluating post-treatment aesthetic improvement.

[OBJECTIVE] To present scale-development activities for the Merz Cheek Fullness Assessment Scale (MCFAS) and report pilot-study results of a hyaluronic-acid filler (Belotero Volume with Lidocaine; CPM-HA-V) to treat midfacial volume loss.

[METHODS] A 5-point photonumeric scale was developed to objectively assess midface volume loss. Rater reliability was evaluated using live assessments. The clinical relevance of a 1-point difference in severity grade was evaluated using photographic comparisons. Pilot-study participants, with moderate-to-severe volume loss on the MCFAS, were randomized 2:1 to treatment or untreated control. Effectiveness was evaluated using the MCFAS, and adverse events were recorded.

[RESULTS] The MCFAS demonstrated substantial intra- and interrater agreement among physicians (weighted kappa > 0.6). The mean absolute difference (95% confidence interval) in scale ratings was 1.12 (1.00, 1.24) for photographic pairs differing by one grade and was 0.55 (0.48, 0.63) for pairs of the same grade, suggesting a 1-point difference is clinically relevant. In the pilot study, significant  (P < 0.0001) differences were observed in MCFAS response rates between treatment and control. No safety concerns were identified.

[CONCLUSION] The MCFAS is a validated, reliable, and clinically relevant photonumeric scale for rating midfacial volume loss in males and females of various ages and skin types. In a pilot study, CPM-HA-V was found to be safe and tolerable, and the MCFAS was able to detect clinically meaningful post-treatment changes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):     doi:10.36849/JDD.7981.