Lifting the midface using a hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine: A randomized multi-center study in a Chinese population.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Soft-tissue augmentation of the midface is increasingly requested by patients, and hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are frequently used in treatment.
[AIMS] To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment of midface volume/contour deficit with a firm HA filler including lidocaine (HA ).
[PATIENTS/METHODS] This was a 12-month, randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study. Chinese adults with mild to substantial volume loss were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to treatment or untreated control groups.
[RESULTS] A total of 148 subjects were enrolled. The primary objective was met; results of the midface volume scale (MMVS) rated by a blinded evaluator were in favor of HA at Month 6 (p < 0.0001 vs. the untreated control group). Similar to the MMVS improvement, improved midface fullness and aesthetic appearance was observed based on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) up to 12 months by both treating investigators and subjects (at least 96% at Week 4 and 65% at Month 12). Subject satisfaction was high, and the majority of subjects considered the results to look natural (>97%). The study product was well tolerated.
[CONCLUSIONS] Midfacial treatment using HA was effective, well tolerated, and led to high levels of satisfaction in a Chinese population for up to 12 months.
[GOV IDENTIFIER] NCT03097783.
[AIMS] To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment of midface volume/contour deficit with a firm HA filler including lidocaine (HA ).
[PATIENTS/METHODS] This was a 12-month, randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study. Chinese adults with mild to substantial volume loss were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to treatment or untreated control groups.
[RESULTS] A total of 148 subjects were enrolled. The primary objective was met; results of the midface volume scale (MMVS) rated by a blinded evaluator were in favor of HA at Month 6 (p < 0.0001 vs. the untreated control group). Similar to the MMVS improvement, improved midface fullness and aesthetic appearance was observed based on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) up to 12 months by both treating investigators and subjects (at least 96% at Week 4 and 65% at Month 12). Subject satisfaction was high, and the majority of subjects considered the results to look natural (>97%). The study product was well tolerated.
[CONCLUSIONS] Midfacial treatment using HA was effective, well tolerated, and led to high levels of satisfaction in a Chinese population for up to 12 months.
[GOV IDENTIFIER] NCT03097783.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | ha
|
히알루론산 | dict | 5 | |
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 2 | |
| 약물 | lidocaine
|
리도카인 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | ha filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Humans; Cosmetic Techniques; Dermal Fillers; East Asian People; Hyaluronic Acid; Lidocaine; Patient Satisfaction; Skin Aging; Treatment Outcome
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.