Comparison of injection comfort of a new category of cohesive hyaluronic acid filler with preincorporated lidocaine and a hyaluronic acid filler alone.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] A smooth, cohesive, 24-mg/mL hyaluronic acid (HA) gel with uniform consistency, even flow characteristics, and extended duration was designed for injection into the mid to deep dermis.
[OBJECTIVE] To compare injection pain of a HA gel with preincorporated lidocaine with that with a non-lidocaine formulation.
[METHODS & MATERIALS] This double-blind study at three centers enrolled 60 subjects, injected with both products, randomly assigned to left or right nasolabial fold. The injecting physician assessed severity of pain and ease of injection. Subjects used a visual analog scale (0-10) for pain assessment. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Physician assessment of injection pain was none or mild in 81% of HA gel injections with preincorporated lidocaine and 36% of HA-alone injections (p<.001). Mean pain assessment by subjects was 3.6 for HA+lidocaine and 5.8 for HA alone (p<.001). Ninety-five percent of the injections were considered easy or very easy; a greater percentage of HA+lidocaine injections were rated very easy. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported for both products.
[CONCLUSION] The smooth, cohesive HA gel with preincorporated lidocaine increased subject comfort during treatment and improved the injection experience.
[OBJECTIVE] To compare injection pain of a HA gel with preincorporated lidocaine with that with a non-lidocaine formulation.
[METHODS & MATERIALS] This double-blind study at three centers enrolled 60 subjects, injected with both products, randomly assigned to left or right nasolabial fold. The injecting physician assessed severity of pain and ease of injection. Subjects used a visual analog scale (0-10) for pain assessment. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Physician assessment of injection pain was none or mild in 81% of HA gel injections with preincorporated lidocaine and 36% of HA-alone injections (p<.001). Mean pain assessment by subjects was 3.6 for HA+lidocaine and 5.8 for HA alone (p<.001). Ninety-five percent of the injections were considered easy or very easy; a greater percentage of HA+lidocaine injections were rated very easy. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported for both products.
[CONCLUSION] The smooth, cohesive HA gel with preincorporated lidocaine increased subject comfort during treatment and improved the injection experience.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | ha
|
히알루론산 | dict | 8 | |
| 약물 | lidocaine
|
리도카인 | dict | 7 | |
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 2 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Injections, Intradermal; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Measurement; Prospective Studies
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.