Trends in free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a single surgeon series of 1027 free tissue transfers.
TL;DR
This study assesses two decades of trends in free flap reconstruction, and how disease incidence, survival, surgeon caseload, team approach, and technology have impacted practice.
📈 연도별 인용 (2024–2026) · 합계 5
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Bone fractures and treatments
APA
Michael Papanikolas, Jonathan R. Clark (2024). Trends in free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a single surgeon series of 1027 free tissue transfers.. ANZ journal of surgery, 94(1-2), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18798
MLA
Michael Papanikolas, et al.. "Trends in free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a single surgeon series of 1027 free tissue transfers.." ANZ journal of surgery, vol. 94, no. 1-2, 2024, pp. 140-147.
PMID
38149718
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Free tissue transfer has fundamentally changed head and neck surgery, enabling reliable reconstruction of large defects with better function and aesthetics. This study assesses two decades of trends in free flap reconstruction, and how disease incidence, survival, surgeon caseload, team approach, and technology have impacted practice.
[METHODS] Retrospective analysis of 1027 head and neck free flaps from 2006 to 2022. Outcomes examined include chronological changes in flap selection, indication, length of stay, incorporation of virtual surgical planning (VSP), annual caseload, survival, and their associations with the single versus multi-team approach.
[RESULTS] There were 764 soft-tissue and 263 osseous reconstructions utilizing 21 different flaps. Anterolateral thigh and radial forearm accounted for 76.7% of soft tissue flaps, with recent increase in superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps in young patients. Osseous flap proportion remained stable, but fibula flaps increased five-fold with more VSP, dental implants, oral cancer, and multi-team surgery. Outcomes such as complication rates, length of stay and disease specific/overall survival have improved over time despite increasing complexity (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in operative time, complication rate, or disease specific/overall survival between single team or multi-team approaches (P = 0.45, P = 0.054, P = 0.57, and P = 0.60, respectively).
[CONCLUSION] Single and multi-team approaches may have similar fundamental outcomes, but as caseload, complexity, and life-expectancy increases, both patients and surgeons benefit from a collaborative multi-team approach that focuses on improving long-term functional outcomes.
[METHODS] Retrospective analysis of 1027 head and neck free flaps from 2006 to 2022. Outcomes examined include chronological changes in flap selection, indication, length of stay, incorporation of virtual surgical planning (VSP), annual caseload, survival, and their associations with the single versus multi-team approach.
[RESULTS] There were 764 soft-tissue and 263 osseous reconstructions utilizing 21 different flaps. Anterolateral thigh and radial forearm accounted for 76.7% of soft tissue flaps, with recent increase in superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps in young patients. Osseous flap proportion remained stable, but fibula flaps increased five-fold with more VSP, dental implants, oral cancer, and multi-team surgery. Outcomes such as complication rates, length of stay and disease specific/overall survival have improved over time despite increasing complexity (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in operative time, complication rate, or disease specific/overall survival between single team or multi-team approaches (P = 0.45, P = 0.054, P = 0.57, and P = 0.60, respectively).
[CONCLUSION] Single and multi-team approaches may have similar fundamental outcomes, but as caseload, complexity, and life-expectancy increases, both patients and surgeons benefit from a collaborative multi-team approach that focuses on improving long-term functional outcomes.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | free flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | soft tissue flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | five-fold
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Free
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSION] Single
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | head and neck surgery
|
C1512343
Head and Neck Surgery
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | oral cancer
|
C0153381
Malignant neoplasm of mouth
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | head and neck
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | disease
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | head and neck free flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | soft-tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Anterolateral thigh
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | radial forearm
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | fibula flaps
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Free Tissue Flaps; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surgeons
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.