Outcomes of patients in rural communities undergoing autologous breast reconstruction: A comparison of cost and patient demographics with implications for rural health policy.

Microsurgery 2024 Vol.44(1) p. e31052

Weidman AA, Kim E, Valentine L, Foppiani J, Alvarez AH, Bustos VP, Lee BT, Lin SJ

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Patients with breast cancer living in rural areas are less likely to undergo breast reconstruction. Further, given the additional training and resources required for autologous reconstruction, it is likely that rural patients face barriers to accessing these surgical options. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine if there are disparities in autologous breast reconstruction care among rural patients on the national level.

[METHODS] The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database was queried from 2012 to 2019 using ICD9/10 codes for breast cancer diagnoses and autologous breast reconstruction. The resulting data set was analyzed for patient, hospital, and complication-specific information with counties comprised of less than 10,000 inhabitants classified as rural.

[RESULTS] From 2012 to 2019, 89,700 weighted encounters for autologous breast reconstruction involved patients who lived in non-rural areas, while 3605 involved patients from rural counties. The majority of rural patients underwent reconstruction at urban teaching hospitals. However, rural patients were more likely than non-rural patients to have their surgery at a rural hospital (6.8% vs. 0.7%). Rural-county residing patients had lower odds of receiving a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap compared to non-rural-county residing patients (OR 0.51 CI: 0.48-0.55, p < .0001). Further, rural patients were more likely to experience infection and wound disruption than urban patients (p < .05), regardless of where they underwent surgery. Complication rates were similar among rural patients who received care at rural hospitals versus urban hospitals (p > .05). Meanwhile, the cost of autologous breast reconstruction was higher (p = .011) for rural patients at an urban hospital ($30,066.2, SD19,965.5) than at a rural hospital ($25,049.5, SD12,397.2).

[CONCLUSION] Patients living in rural areas face disparities in health care, including lower odds of being potentially offered gold-standard breast reconstruction treatments. Increased microsurgical option availability and patient education in rural areas may help alleviate current disparities in breast reconstruction.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 10
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
합병증 infection 감염 dict 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Patients with scispacy 1
질환 breast cancer C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 complication-specific scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Rural Population; Mammaplasty; Breast Neoplasms; Health Policy; Demography; Perforator Flap; Retrospective Studies

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문