본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Hand Surgery Fellowship Case Minimums: History and Design.

The Journal of hand surgery 2024 Vol.49(7) p. 698-701 피인용 1회 🌐 cited 4 Innovations in Medical Education
TL;DR Starting in 2019 and working collaboratively with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the Hand Fellowship Director's Association has since modified the methods by which programs are evaluated, pivoting away from comparative percentages to the establishment of case minimums.
📈 연도별 인용 (2025–2026) · 합계 4
OpenAlex 토픽 · Innovations in Medical Education Diversity and Career in Medicine Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Hines K, Rozental TD, Murray P, Harper CM

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA K. Hines, Tamara D. Rozental, et al. (2024). Hand Surgery Fellowship Case Minimums: History and Design.. The Journal of hand surgery, 49(7), 698-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.02.009
MLA K. Hines, et al.. "Hand Surgery Fellowship Case Minimums: History and Design.." The Journal of hand surgery, vol. 49, no. 7, 2024, pp. 698-701.
PMID 38597837

Abstract

In the 1960s, the American Society for Surgery of the Hand embarked on an endeavor to improve and standardize the educational experience in hand surgery. By the 1980s, numerous programs existed across the country with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education formally recognizing orthopedic surgery-based fellowships in 1985 and plastic surgery-based fellowships in 1986. In order to sit for what was then termed the Certificate of Additional Qualification examination, applicants had to demonstrate performance of a specific number of procedures while in practice. Borrowing from this theme, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began to analyze programs according to the relative proportion of cases done by fellows at individual institutions compared to national trends. Beginning in 2019 and working collaboratively with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the Hand Fellowship Director's Association has since modified the methods by which programs are evaluated, pivoting away from comparative percentages to the establishment of case minimums. The development of this process has been iterative with the resultant outcome being an evaluation system that focuses on educational quality and technical proficiency over sheer numerical volume.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Accreditation; Clinical Competence; Education, Medical, Graduate; Fellowships and Scholarships; Hand; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Orthopedics; Surgery, Plastic; United States

📑 인용 관계