The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group.
4/5 보강
TL;DR
In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, terazosin was effective therapy, whereas finasteride was not, and the combination of terazOSin and finasterside was no more effective than terazoshin alone.
📑 코퍼스 인용 관계
· 인용됨 4
📑 인용한 논문 (4) ▾
- SRD5A2 and emerging therapies in androgen-driven disorders. Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
- Short-term Effect of Tamsulosin and Finasteride Monotherapy and their Combination on Niger… Nigerian journal of surgery : official publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society · 2017
- [Combined treatment of BPS with tamsulosin and finasteride : Literature review and prescri… Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017
- Adverse Effects and Safety of 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors (Finasteride, Dutasteride): A S… The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2016
연도별 인용 (2012–2026) · 합계 192
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Abstract 🌐 Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia can be treated with alpha 1-adrenergic-antagonist drugs that relax prostatic smooth muscle or with drugs that inhibit 5 alpha-reductase and therefore reduce tissue androgen concentrations. However, the effects of the two types of drugs have not been compared.
[METHODS] We compared the safety and efficacy of placebo, terazosin (10 mg daily), finasteride (5 mg daily), and the combination of both drugs in 1229 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. American Urological Association symptom scores and peak urinary-flow rates were determined at base line and periodically for one year.
[RESULTS] The mean changes from base line in the symptom scores in the placebo, finasteride, terazosin, and combination-therapy groups at one year were decreases of 2.6, 3.2, 6.1, and 6.2 points, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). The mean changes at one year in the peak urinary-flow rates were increases of 1.4, 1.6, 2.7, and 3.2 ml per second, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). Finasteride had no more effect on either measure than placebo. In the placebo group, 1.6 percent of the men discontinued the study because of adverse effects, as did 4.8 to 7.8 percent of the men in the other three groups.
[CONCLUSIONS] In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, terazosin was effective therapy, whereas finasteride was not, and the combination of terazosin and finasteride was no more effective than terazosin alone.
[METHODS] We compared the safety and efficacy of placebo, terazosin (10 mg daily), finasteride (5 mg daily), and the combination of both drugs in 1229 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. American Urological Association symptom scores and peak urinary-flow rates were determined at base line and periodically for one year.
[RESULTS] The mean changes from base line in the symptom scores in the placebo, finasteride, terazosin, and combination-therapy groups at one year were decreases of 2.6, 3.2, 6.1, and 6.2 points, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). The mean changes at one year in the peak urinary-flow rates were increases of 1.4, 1.6, 2.7, and 3.2 ml per second, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). Finasteride had no more effect on either measure than placebo. In the placebo group, 1.6 percent of the men discontinued the study because of adverse effects, as did 4.8 to 7.8 percent of the men in the other three groups.
[CONCLUSIONS] In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, terazosin was effective therapy, whereas finasteride was not, and the combination of terazosin and finasteride was no more effective than terazosin alone.
- p-value P<0.001
In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, terazosin was effective therapy, whereas finasteride was not, and the combination of terazOSin and finasterside was no more effective than terazoshin alone.
APA 7
Lepor, H., Williford, W. O., Barry, M. J., Brawer, M. K., Dixon, C. M., Gormley, G., Haakenson, C., Machi, M., Narayan, P., & Padley, R. J. (1996). The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans affairs cooperative studies benign prostatic hyperplasia study group.. The New England journal of medicine, 335(8), 533-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199608223350801
Vancouver
Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ, Brawer MK, Dixon CM, Gormley G, et al. The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group. New Engl. jour. medi.. 1996;335(8):533-9. doi:10.1056/NEJM199608223350801
AMA 11
Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ, Brawer MK, Dixon CM, Gormley G, et al. The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group. New Engl. jour. medi.. 1996;335(8):533-9. doi:10.1056/NEJM199608223350801
Chicago
Lepor, H., Williford, W. O., Barry, M. J., Brawer, M. K., Dixon, C. M., Gormley, G., Haakenson, C., Machi, M., Narayan, P., and Padley, R. J.. 1996. "The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group." The New England journal of medicine 335 (8): 533-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199608223350801
MLA 9
Lepor, H., et al. "The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group." The New England journal of medicine, vol. 335, no. 8, 1996, pp. 533-9. doi:10.1056/NEJM199608223350801.
PMID
8684407 ↗
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
인용 관계
그래프 OA 노드: 2/4 (50%)
· 참조 0편 · 후속 2편
이 논문을 인용한 후속 연구 4
- Adverse Effects and Safety of 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors (Finasteride, Dutasteride): A Systematic …
- SRD5A2 and emerging therapies in androgen-driven disorders.
- [Combined treatment of BPS with tamsulosin and finasteride : Literature review and prescription data…
- Short-term Effect of Tamsulosin and Finasteride Monotherapy and their Combination on Nigerian Men wi…
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Factors predicting sexual function dissatisfaction following primary partial gland cryoablation.
- Routine prostate biopsies not needed after cryotherapy if surveillance MRI is normal.
- Functional, oncological, regret and complications following partial gland cryo-ablation for low-risk prostate cancer associated with MPMRI targets.
- MRI performance to identify clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryo-ablation.
- Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- 피나스테리드가 전립선암 발생에 미치는 영향.
- COVID-19의 50가지 이상의 장기 후유증: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석.
- 양성 전립선 비대증의 임상적 진행에 대한 doxazosin, finasteride 및 병용 요법의 장기 효과.
- 양성 전립선 비대증 환자에서 finasteride의 효과. The Finasteride Study Group.
- 양성 전립선 비대증 남성에서 급성 요폐의 위험과 수술적 치료 필요성에 대한 finasteride의 효과. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group.
- 원형 탈모에 대한 전장유전체 연관성 연구는 선천면역과 적응면역 모두의 관여를 시사한다.