Optimizing Quality of Life for Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Prospective Study Combining DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction and Lymphedema Surgery.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema can be treated with a simultaneous deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer, and lymphovenous anastomosis for aesthetic breast reconstruction and lymphedema in one operation.
[METHODS] The authors performed a comparison of prospectively followed patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and anastomosis to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer alone.
[RESULTS] Thirty-three patients underwent DIEP flap reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, and 21 received a free flap with lymph node transfer alone. There were no significant differences in demographics, adjuvant chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. The average number of nodes removed was also equivalent (21.2 versus 21.4 nodes). Two anastomoses per patient, on average, were performed (range, one to four) in the combined cohort, and all patients (100 percent) reported a subjective improvement in symptoms, compared with 81.0 percent of patients undergoing only lymph node transfer (p = 0.019). Perometer measurements demonstrated a significant reduction between the groups at early time points [3 months, 40.7 percent versus 20.0 percent (p = 0.037); 6 months, 57.0 percent versus 44.5 percent (p = 0.043)]; however, the difference was not statistically significant at 12 months (60.4 percent versus 57.8 percent; p = 0.43).
[CONCLUSION] This is the first prospective study demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a combined DIEP flap with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, which may be superior to lymph node transfer alone.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.
[METHODS] The authors performed a comparison of prospectively followed patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and anastomosis to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer alone.
[RESULTS] Thirty-three patients underwent DIEP flap reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, and 21 received a free flap with lymph node transfer alone. There were no significant differences in demographics, adjuvant chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. The average number of nodes removed was also equivalent (21.2 versus 21.4 nodes). Two anastomoses per patient, on average, were performed (range, one to four) in the combined cohort, and all patients (100 percent) reported a subjective improvement in symptoms, compared with 81.0 percent of patients undergoing only lymph node transfer (p = 0.019). Perometer measurements demonstrated a significant reduction between the groups at early time points [3 months, 40.7 percent versus 20.0 percent (p = 0.037); 6 months, 57.0 percent versus 44.5 percent (p = 0.043)]; however, the difference was not statistically significant at 12 months (60.4 percent versus 57.8 percent; p = 0.43).
[CONCLUSION] This is the first prospective study demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a combined DIEP flap with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, which may be superior to lymph node transfer alone.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 6 | |
| 시술 | free flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | diep flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | lymphedema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | flap breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Patients with
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | lymphovenous
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
|
C4277512
Breast Cancer Lymphedema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | DIEP
→ deep inferior epigastric perforator
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | lymphedema
|
C0024236
Lymphedema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | DIEP
→ deep inferior epigastric perforator
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | inguinal lymph node
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | lymph node
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nodes
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Aftercare; Aged; Anastomosis, Surgical; Breast Cancer Lymphedema; Breast Neoplasms; Epigastric Arteries; Female; Humans; Inguinal Canal; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Vessels; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Perforator Flap; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.