Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and risk factors of different breast reconstruction strategies following polyacrylamide hydrogel removal: A 20-year retrospective cohort study of 436 cases.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Globally implemented for breast augmentation, polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) always leads to breast deformity upon its removal. Despite a pressing need for breast reconstruction following PAAG removal to address aesthetic issues, the optimal timing remains controversial.
[METHODS] A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent PAAG removal between 2003 and 2023. They were categorized into three cohorts: immediate (IBR), delayed (DBR), or no breast reconstruction (NBR) post-PAAG removal. Complication rates, re-operation frequencies, risk factors, and BREAST-Q scores were assessed.
[RESULTS] A total of 436 breasts were identified and divided into IBR (n = 126), DBR (n = 48), and NBR (n = 262). Complication rates were 50.0 % (IBR), 31.3 % (DBR), and 26.7 % (NBR) (P < 0.001); reoperation rates were 26.2 % (IBR), 18.8 % (DBR), and 13.0 % (NBR) (P = 0.006). IBR showed significantly shorter complication-free survival than NBR (113.38 ± 8.34 vs. 178.21 ± 6.82 months; log-rank P < 0.001). Cox regression identified injection period, aspiration history, Baker grade II/III/IV, glandular infiltration, and IBR as independent predictors of higher postoperative complications. As for the Breast-Q scores, physical well-being was similar across groups. However, NBR scored significantly lower for postoperative sexual well-being (P < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (P < 0.001), and satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) compared to both IBR and DBR.
[CONCLUSIONS] DBR is a safe and effective solution for secondary breast deformities after PAAG removal. Notably, patients with prolonged injection histories, previous aspiration history, Baker Grade II/III/IV, and MRI evidence of gel infiltration into glandular tissues are at a higher risk for postoperative complications. These findings may be beneficial for optimizing strategies to manage patients with PAAG injections in clinical practice.
[METHODS] A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent PAAG removal between 2003 and 2023. They were categorized into three cohorts: immediate (IBR), delayed (DBR), or no breast reconstruction (NBR) post-PAAG removal. Complication rates, re-operation frequencies, risk factors, and BREAST-Q scores were assessed.
[RESULTS] A total of 436 breasts were identified and divided into IBR (n = 126), DBR (n = 48), and NBR (n = 262). Complication rates were 50.0 % (IBR), 31.3 % (DBR), and 26.7 % (NBR) (P < 0.001); reoperation rates were 26.2 % (IBR), 18.8 % (DBR), and 13.0 % (NBR) (P = 0.006). IBR showed significantly shorter complication-free survival than NBR (113.38 ± 8.34 vs. 178.21 ± 6.82 months; log-rank P < 0.001). Cox regression identified injection period, aspiration history, Baker grade II/III/IV, glandular infiltration, and IBR as independent predictors of higher postoperative complications. As for the Breast-Q scores, physical well-being was similar across groups. However, NBR scored significantly lower for postoperative sexual well-being (P < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (P < 0.001), and satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) compared to both IBR and DBR.
[CONCLUSIONS] DBR is a safe and effective solution for secondary breast deformities after PAAG removal. Notably, patients with prolonged injection histories, previous aspiration history, Baker Grade II/III/IV, and MRI evidence of gel infiltration into glandular tissues are at a higher risk for postoperative complications. These findings may be beneficial for optimizing strategies to manage patients with PAAG injections in clinical practice.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 8 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | breasts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | glandular tissues
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | ± 8.34 vs. 178.21
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] DBR
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breast deformity
|
C0567474
Deformity of breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breasts
|
C0006141
Breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast deformities
|
C0567474
Deformity of breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | IBR
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | glandular
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.